No Erasers
You're doing everything right.
You went from associate to manager in record time. Then senior manager. Your LinkedIn profile is the picture of perfect health.
But there's a voice. Quiet at first. Now it's getting louder.
Am I building anything real? Or just collecting digitally gilded certificates?
The Laboratory
For 12 years, my MBA classmates climbed the corporate pecking order. I announced indoor track meets. Nine hours at a time. On Saturdays. Managing 600 athletes, 30 coaches, officials, parents, and fans—all with competing needs.
Every decision is public. Every mistake is immediate. The microphone doesn't have an eraser.
Week after week, I earn trust in real time, under scrutiny, without a title.
And here's the painful part: All the upside goes to someone else. When the event succeeds, the track program gets the credit. When I fail, 1,500 people hear it.
But here's what I get: Access to a laboratory for decision-making under pressure.
Your quarterly earnings calls? My 1,500-person audience. Different stakes. Same capability.
James March—Stanford professor, 1990s—knew that leadership requires two skills: poetry and plumbing.
Poetry to inspire. Plumbing to execute.
Poetry to create meaning. Plumbing to create systems.
The debate since then: Operations handles the plumbing—"You can't make anything without me." Communications provides poetry—"You can't breathe without me."
In my track meet laboratory, I proved you need both.
For twelve years, I tested this toggle. I call it "the flow and the show."
Flow: What keeps the event moving.
Show: The moments people remember.
You don't choose one or the other. You stand tall in the middle of it all, switching so fast people don't notice.
That's dynamic decision-making.
It's the most complex skill to build. You can't practice it safely.
A parent confronted me about a weather delay. His kid did everything right, arrived on time. Others hadn't. Why the 30-minute penalty?
He wasn't wrong. I could feel the pressure—no time for clever improvisation.
I'd run this scenario a hundred times. What values do I lead with? When the moment came, I was ready.
"Grace," I said. "It's a life skill."
One sentence. That parent still comes to our meets.
I announced the wrong team for a conference champion. In front of everyone. On a day that mattered.
The coach gave me two seconds. Quick fix or full reset?
I chose reset. Accuracy over ego. Apologized directly to the athlete.
The coach and I still work together.
These aren't stories. They are capabilities.
Professor March knew this in the 1990s. Researchers today keep proving he was right.
Amanda Montell: Language doesn't just describe reality. It shapes it.
When I said, "Grace, it's a life skill," I didn't win the argument. I changed the argument from fairness to values.
Charles Duhigg: Supercommunicators know that acknowledgment comes before reasoning.
That parent needed to feel heard before he could listen to me.
Susan Cain: Quiet strength means choosing accuracy over ego.
The reset wasn't about my mistake. It was about the relationship.
The Clarity
My classmates have titles I don't. I have capabilities they've never tested.
I didn't waste twelve years. I invested them.
The twelve years weren't preparation for a corner office. That was never the design.
They were preparation for work that actually matters—for the next thirty years of my career, and yours.
A microphone doesn't have an eraser. Neither do the choices you make about where to practice and what to build.
So the question isn't whether I wasted my time. The question is the one you're already asking:
What are you capable of?
The voice won't stop until you answer it.
Post a comment